Mind + Muscle

technical minds + legal muscle



ITC Section 337 Investigations

Choosing the right law firm to defend your business in a fast-paced, high stakes, legally and technically complex investigation before the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) is critical. Read on to find out why companies choose Sterne Kessler to work with them on ITC matters.

Your intellectual property is the lifeblood of your business.

Consider this scenario - you are doing business in the United States and have a patent, formula, or design that provides you with a unique competitive advantage. But with the expansive growth in emerging markets, the blurring of international trade barriers, and the explosion of digital communications, you are seeing intellectual property infringement by overseas competitors and your market share dwindle. What can you do?

More and more, companies faced with this type of scenario turn to the ITC. The ITC is a forum for resolving intellectual property disputes involving unfair competition in the import trade—including allegations of patent or trademark infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets and violations of antitrust laws. To view the growing trend of ITC investigations conducted over time, click on the graph below.

Click Here to View More Information Related to Our ITC Practice: 

The ITC is a unique legal forum demanding special legal insights.

The ITC conducts its investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. §1337 (commonly referred to as Section 337). These administrative due process proceedings take, on average, between 15 to 18 months, and allow all parties to engage in full discovery. A hearing on the merits usually occurs within 7 to 9 months after an investigation is instituted. If the ITC determines Section 337 has been violated, the remedies available include an ITC order to the U.S. Customs and Border Enforcement to exclude the infringing articles from entry into the U.S., and cease and desist orders that require the violating party to stop selling any infringing articles already imported into the U.S.

The pace is fast. The stakes are high.

Section 337 investigations are complex - requiring a unique blend of litigation, administrative law, patent law and technical skills - and proceed at a very fast pace. Any adverse outcome can have serious and immediate consequences for commercial manufacturers, importers, and retailers of accused products. Because of the fast track nature of the proceedings, the complex issues involved in the accused technology, and the need to follow precise rules established by the ITC, there is little, if any, room for error. That is why you need a legal partner with the specialized experience and insight required to handle the unique rigors and requirements of such an investigation - a partner like Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox.

Why Sterne Kessler?

  • We know the ITC process. We have successfully represented both complainants and respondents in more than 40 Section 337 matters involving well-known international companies. This depth of knowledge and experience gives us strategic and tactical insights that enable us to win 337 investigations.

  • The deepest technical knowledge in IP. Most Sterne Kessler professionals hold an advanced level degree, including 50+ PhDs in science and engineering and many more have significant industry experience. Our technical backgrounds enable us to get through detailed technical analysis to get up to speed on the technology at issue very quickly.

  • Close proximity to the ITC. Being in Washington, D.C. makes for greater cost and logistical efficiencies, which are especially critical in this kind of “fast track” litigation and helps us to remain current and expand our knowledge base.

  • Fluent in more than 20 languages. This includes many key Asian languages spoken by parties often before the ITC.

(1) Success Stories

  • BTG International v. Laboratorios Silanes


    SKGF clinched a win for snake anti-venom manufacturer Bioclon (Silanes). The settlement included a payment of $6,000,000 in legal fees as well as certainty on a launch date.

  • Converse Inc. v Tory Burch


    When Converse, Inc. alleged trademark infringement of its popular Chuck Taylor tennis shoes, SKGF’s team creatively and quickly negotiated a favorable settlement of the matter on behalf of Ms. Burch by using the USITC to leverage the weakness in Converse's allegations of trademark infringement.

  • Eli Lilly v. Intas Pharmaceuticals


    SKGF handled a variety of complex and first-of-their-kind issues. ITC delayed their vote for institution a record three times, ITC (OUII) recommended against institution. Ultimately, Eli Lilly withdraw the complaint.

  • Ivoclar Vivadent v. Dentsply International


    Action prevented Dentsply from expanding its U.S. market share for select dental ceramic products. End result was a global patent license and favorable settlement agreement.

(4) Sterne Kessler Welcomes Litigators John Christopher Rozendaal & Michael Joffre to the Firm

Sterne Kessler Welcomes Litigators John Christopher Rozendaal & Michael Joffre to the Firm
A Case Study:

Sterne Kessler Welcomes Litigators John Christopher Rozendaal & Michael Joffre to the Firm

Sterne Kessler is pleased to announce that John Christopher (J.C.) Rozendaal and Michael Joffre have joined the firm as directors.


Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. will not be considered confidential or privileged, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Sterne Kessler.  If you are not already a client of Sterne Kessler, do not include any confidential information in this message.