Mind + Muscle

technical minds + legal muscle


dig deep

An Alternative Attack in Inter Partes Review

  • 10.29.14
  • Robert C. Millonig, Jr., Ph.D. and Gaby L. Longsworth, Ph.D.
  • IP Law360

Since the implementation of the America Invents Act in 2011, inter partes review (IPR) proceedings have proven useful tools for invalidating patents. In this article, Robert C. Millonig, Jr., Ph.D. and Gaby L. Longsworth, Ph.D. discuss an alternative attack for IPRs focused on challenging a patent's priority claims.

As the authors explain, IPRs restrict validity challenges to novelty or obviousness, however, in certain circumstances challenges may skirt this restriction by challenging the priority claims of a patent. By breaking priority to an earlier-filed patent application, the challenged patent may be opened up to more prior art that could be used against it for novelty or obviousness challenges.

To read the full article, please download the attached PDF. Subscribers can read the full article on Law 360's website.

Related People

Related Services

Sort By Media Type

Sort By Media Type
  • AlertAlert
  • BriefsBriefs
  • Comments to USPTOComments to USPTO
  • Design Patent Case DigestDesign Patent Case Digest
  • MultimediaMultimedia
  • News & ArticlesNews & Articles
  • Press ReleasePress Release
  • VideoVideo
  • WebinarWebinar

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. will not be considered confidential or privileged, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Sterne Kessler.  If you are not already a client of Sterne Kessler, do not include any confidential information in this message.