Mind + Muscle

technical minds + legal muscle

Bracket

dig deep

Claims Unpatentable for Obviousness in Final Written Decision IPR2014-00402 – Butamax Advanced Biofuels v. Gevo

  • 08.16.15
  • Peter A. Jackman, Deborah Sterling, Ph.D., Pratibha Khanduri, Ph.D., Christopher M. Gallo, Ph.D. & Rami Bardenstein
  • The National Law Review

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently found all challenged claims of patent 8,373,012, covering methods for making renewable jet fuel from blendstock, unpatentable for obviousness. The final written decision issued for inter partes review (IPR), Butamax Advanced Biofuels v. Gevo, claims that "the background knowledge possessed by a person having ordinary skill in the art is an integral part of an obviousness analysis."

Butamax Advanced Biofuels was represented in this IPR by a team of Sterne Kessler PTO litigation and Clean technology specialists including Peter A. Jackman, Deborah Sterling, Ph.D.Pratibha Khanduri, Ph.D., Christopher M. Gallo, Ph.D. & Rami Bardenstein.

More information can be found in a summary and analysis article authored by the PTAB Trial Blog and published on The National Law Review.

Sort By Media Type

Sort By Media Type
  • AlertAlert
  • BriefsBriefs
  • Comments to USPTOComments to USPTO
  • Design Patent Case DigestDesign Patent Case Digest
  • MultimediaMultimedia
  • News & ArticlesNews & Articles
  • Press ReleasePress Release
  • VideoVideo
  • WebinarWebinar
X

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. will not be considered confidential or privileged, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Sterne Kessler.  If you are not already a client of Sterne Kessler, do not include any confidential information in this message.