Mind + Muscle

technical minds + legal muscle


dig deep

In Oral Arguments during Bowman v. Monsanto the Supreme Court Struggles with Exhaustion Doctrine for Patented Seeds

  • 02.22.13
  • Judith U. Kim and Jorge A. Goldstein, Ph.D.
  • Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox

On February 19, 2013, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Vernon Hugh Bowman v. Monsanto Company.  This case has far-reaching implications for the patent exhaustion or first sale doctrine in self-replicating technologies such as seeds, microorganisms, tissue culture, etc.  For example, even if a seed company does not have a sophisticated, licensing or conditional sale program like Monsanto, under the Federal Circuit holding on appeal, if a grower buys patent protected seeds (first generation) without any restrictions and saves later generations of seeds for replanting, the grower can be liable for patent infringement with respect to the later generation seeds.  Based on the line of questioning during the Supreme Court oral arguments, the Court debated how to apply the patent exhaustion doctrine to self-replicating technologies and appeared to struggle with drawing a line between second generation and later generation progenies.

To view our full summary, download the attached PDF.

Related People

Related Services

Related Industries

Sort By Media Type

Sort By Media Type
  • AlertAlert
  • BriefsBriefs
  • Comments to USPTOComments to USPTO
  • Design Patent Case DigestDesign Patent Case Digest
  • MultimediaMultimedia
  • News & ArticlesNews & Articles
  • Press ReleasePress Release
  • VideoVideo
  • WebinarWebinar

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. will not be considered confidential or privileged, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Sterne Kessler.  If you are not already a client of Sterne Kessler, do not include any confidential information in this message.