Mind + Muscle

technical minds + legal muscle


dig deep

Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.: Rejecting Brooks Furniture's Rigid Standard for Fee-Shifting in Patent Litigation

  • 07.15.14
  • Peter A. Jackman
  • MSBA Annual IP Law Update 2014

In this article, Peter A. Jackman discusses the Supreme Court's ruling in Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. As Mr. Jackman explains, the ruling "greatly liberalized the standard by which district courts award attorney fees to the prevailing parties of a patent litigation." The article examines the Supreme Court's ruling, the previous statutes regarding fee-shifting, and possible implications regarding future patent litigation.

To read the full article, please download the attached PDF and visit pages 18 and 19.

Related People

Sort By Media Type

Sort By Media Type
  • AlertAlert
  • BriefsBriefs
  • Comments to USPTOComments to USPTO
  • Design Patent Case DigestDesign Patent Case Digest
  • MultimediaMultimedia
  • News & ArticlesNews & Articles
  • Press ReleasePress Release
  • VideoVideo
  • WebinarWebinar

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. will not be considered confidential or privileged, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Sterne Kessler.  If you are not already a client of Sterne Kessler, do not include any confidential information in this message.