Mind + Muscle

technical minds + legal muscle


dig deep

Patent Infringement: Foreseeable Equivalents Can Infringe Under the Doctrine of Equivalents

  • 03.31.14
  • Gaby Longsworth and Chenghua Luo
  • The Maryland State Bar Association Bar Bulletin

Gaby Longsworth, Ph.D. and Chenghua Luo, Ph.D. note that courts have formulated several tests for the determination of equivalents. In the past, decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit appeared to indicate that the doctrine of equivalents does not capture subject matter that the patent drafter reasonably could have foreseen during the application process and claimed.  However, in a recent decision Ring & Pinion Serv. Inc., v. ARB Corp. Ltd., No. 2013-1238 (Fed. Cir., February 19, 2014), the Federal Circuit departed from this line of reasoning and held that foreseeability of an equivalent at the time of patenting is not a bar to a finding of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.  This article in the March 2014 issue of the Maryland State Bar Association Bar Bulletin discusses this topic in more detail.

Visit msba.org to read the full article.

Related People

Related Services

Sort By Media Type

Sort By Media Type
  • AlertAlert
  • BriefsBriefs
  • Comments to USPTOComments to USPTO
  • Design Patent Case DigestDesign Patent Case Digest
  • MultimediaMultimedia
  • News & ArticlesNews & Articles
  • Press ReleasePress Release
  • VideoVideo
  • WebinarWebinar

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. will not be considered confidential or privileged, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Sterne Kessler.  If you are not already a client of Sterne Kessler, do not include any confidential information in this message.