Mind + Muscle

technical minds + legal muscle

Bracket

dig deep

Sandoz Decision Increases Importance of Post-Grant Proceedings to Biosimilar Developers

  • 01.29.15
  • Timothy J. Shea, Jr. and Paul A. Calvo, Ph.D.
  • IP Litigator

In this article published by IP Litigator, Timothy J. Shea, Jr. and Paul A. Calvo, Ph.D. discuss the recent decision in Sandoz, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc.  On December 5, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rendered its decision in Sandoz v. Amgen, No. 2014-1693, a case with major implications for the emerging U.S. biosimilars industry.  The decision addresses when and how a party seeking to launch a biosimilar product in the U.S. can initiate litigation to challenge the brand company’s potential blocking patents.  This is the first instance in which the Federal Circuit has had the opportunity to address the scope and applicability of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), which established a formal pathway for biosimilar approval in the US.

To read the full article in IP Litigator, download the attached PDF. 

Related People

Related Services

Related Industries

Sort By Media Type

Sort By Media Type
  • AlertAlert
  • BriefsBriefs
  • Comments to USPTOComments to USPTO
  • Design Patent Case DigestDesign Patent Case Digest
  • MultimediaMultimedia
  • News & ArticlesNews & Articles
  • Press ReleasePress Release
  • VideoVideo
  • WebinarWebinar
X

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. will not be considered confidential or privileged, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Sterne Kessler.  If you are not already a client of Sterne Kessler, do not include any confidential information in this message.